The Enablers

 

Enablers are all around us, helping irresponsible illegals evade the consequences of their actions.

 

Years ago, when I had friends with serious substance

abuse problems (mostly alcoholism), I became aware of

Alcoholics Anonymous, an organization which has helped

many with addiction problems.  While I did not

entirely endorse their creed and method of treatment,

I learned some interesting things from AA.

 

There is a type of person which many alcoholics have

in their lives called an "enabler."  An Enabler is

someone who makes it possible for the alcoholic to go

on drinking without experiencing the negative

consequences of his actions.  The Enabler is almost

always a loved one, whether a spouse or a biological

relative.  The Enabler makes excuses for the

alcoholic, and helps him cover up his behavior.  She

phones in to work and tells them that he is "sick"

when he really has a horrific hangover and is spending

most of his time vomiting with his head over the

porcelain bowl.  She tells the kids that daddy's not

well, he just had an accident, when he comes home so

drunk that he falls down and pees his pants.  When the

alcoholic behaves badly in public, the Enabler tells

others that she's just "under a lot of stress."  An

Enabler goes around the house putting away liquor

bottles, helping the secret drinker stay secret.  The

Enabler forgives the alcoholic most of her

indiscretions while enabling her to engage in even

more outrageous behavior.

 

In other words, Enablers help alcoholics to avoid, for

a period of time, taking responsibility for the

natural consequences of their own actions.  Enablers

serve as a buffer between the alcoholic and the

outside world; they keep alcoholics from falling in

the gutter, which AA claims is the eventual result of

the "disease" they call alcoholism.  According to AA,

many, if not most, alcoholics have to literally end up

in the gutter, to have their lives become a complete

disaster, before they are willing to stop drinking and

make substantial changes.

 

There are many Enablers among us.  Some masquerade as

do-gooders, and think they are helping the "less

fortunate."  The Enablers among us love to help those

poor, down-trodden huddled masses of the third world

impoverished yearning to breathe free and to achieve

the American dream, whether by hook or by crook.  They

help illegal aliens who have broken our laws by

trespassing into our country!

 

Whether the Enablers are county health workers,

policemen, churches providing sanctuary, welfare case

workers helping illegals sign up for welfare, La Raza,

MALDEF, or your neighbor who hires Jose to do his

gardening, they are sticking a knife in the back of

every American Citizen, for they are enabling illegal

aliens to avoid the negative consequences of being

illegally present in the United States.  Without a

support network and willing employers, illegal aliens

would not survive in the United States, and they would

go back to their native countries.  Without the help

of Enablers, it would no longer PAY to be in the U.S.

 

At what point does such help cease to become

"enabling" and become aiding and abetting?  America is

so overrun with illegal aliens that they are like an

every-day disease that has become an epidemic.  And

with Enablers like Christian Peacemakers, No More

Deaths, and Humane Borders, just to name a few, and

the laissez-faire interior enforcement policy of

ICE, an illegal is virtually assured that he will be

able to stay in the United States as long as he wants.

 

The Enablers ensure than an illegal alien will not

have to face up to the consequences of his actions;

the cop who lets someone he KNOWS is illegal get off

with a citation for a traffic offense, rather than a

jailing, is equally guilty of Enabling.  Look at these

paraphrased excerpts of the Federal Immigration and

Nationality Act Section 8 USC 1324

(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) of 1996:

 

State and local law enforcement officials have the

general power to investigate and arrest violators of

federal immigration statutes without prior INS

knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized

to do so by state law.  There is "no extant federal

limitation" on this authority.

 

The 1996 immigration control legislation passed

by Congress was intended to encourage states

and local agencies to participate in

the process of enforcing federal immigration laws.

Immigration officers and local law enforcement

officers may detain an individual for a brief

warrant-less interrogation where circumstances create

a reasonable suspicion that the individual is

illegally present in the U.S.  Specific facts

constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive,

nervous or erratic behavior, dress or speech

indicating foreign citizenship, and presence in an

area known to contain a concentration of illegal

aliens.

 

This section encourages local law enforcement to work

with federal CBP and ICE in apprehending illegal

aliens!  Any law enforcement officer who is still

following Special Order 40, which prohibits local law

enforcement from taking any substantive efforts

against illegal aliens, is guilty of aiding and

abetting illegals. 

 

I wonder, do those who Enable (aid, abet, and harbor)

illegal aliens know that not all of them are "poor?"

For example, many illegals now pay smugglers between

$1,500-$2,500 to get them across the border.  I don't

know about you, but it hurts me greatly to get up a

few hundred dollars just for car repairs, and

sometimes I'm not sure if I can pay rent when my car

is broken.  Where do "poor" people get over $1,000 to

pay a smuggler?  Who did they rob?  Middle Eastern men

are known to pay $50,000 to be smuggled into this

country, and anyone who has that kind of money isn't

going to be working as a common laborer.

 

In spite of the dangers, we are a nation of Enablers.

It started with discouraging people to take

responsibility for their own actions, with liberals

encouraging the lesser-fortunate to blame society,

circumstances, their parents, etc., for the

consequences of their own actions.  Somehow or

another, they went bad because "we" failed them.

We forced them to take drugs, we forced them to be

self-destructive, and we forced them to be violent.

It wasn't their fault, cry the Enablers.

 

The Enablers (usually liberals), can feel superior to

those whom they serve, and the high they get from

helping those "less fortunate" can become an end in

itself.  They feel so noble and good, they want to do

it again and again!  Yet do they live among those whom

they serve?  I don't see any Caucasian liberals living

in the barrios.  No, they don't want to associate with

the riff-raff that they serve when they are off-duty--they

all live in the hills, or in gated communities, where

there is perfect homogeneity.  And so it is in Mexico,

where the Castilian descendants of the Conquistadors,

like Vicente Fox, live in walled-in splendor, while

the darker-skinned majority of natives and Mestizos

live in abject poverty.  Where are the social workers

in Mexico? 

 

There are whole industries built around the concept of

Enabling: grant-writing, NGO's (non-governmental

organizations), the non-profit sector, "public"

healthcare, gimmicks to get more government handouts,

survey-taking, phony results reports, all run by

endless paperwork.  We, as a society, have been taken

over by the Enablers.  Acting as an Enabler has become

the drug of choice for liberal do-gooders.  Once a

person has an Enabler going to bat for him, he need

never take responsibility for himself and his own

actions.

 

The people who staff the illegal alien aid stations

think they are helping poor people who are desperate

and needy.  I wonder if they know they are committing

felonies?  Again, from the Federal Immigration and

Nationality Act:

 

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal,

harbor, or shield from detection in any place,

including any building or means of transportation, any

alien who is in the United States in violation of law.

 Harboring means any conduct that tends to

substantially facilitate an alien to remain in the

U.S. illegally.  The sheltering need not be

clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested

outdoors, as well as in a building.  This provision

includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S.

legally, but has since lost his legal status.

 

Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to

commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry penalties

of up to a maximum of 5, 10, and 20 years to life in

prison if someone was hurt or killed.  Conspiracy to

commit the crimes of sheltering, harboring, or

employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense

punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years

imprisonment.  Sentences for each count may run

consecutively rather than concurrently.

 

Why aren't our federal officials arresting these

people for harboring and sheltering?  Some of them

actually transport the illegals to Tucson and give

them shelter in their homes or churches.  [See the

article here called "No Illegal Alien Left Behind"].

Doesn't that meet the definition of

aiding/abetting/harboring?  No, instead the OBL (Open

Borders Lobby) bleats about the aliens' "civil

rights," not OURS, and local law enforcement, with few

exceptions, dances to their tune, deterring honest

American citizens from trying to keep their country

safe from invaders.

 

I propose a new name for the Open Borders Lobby.  I'm

going to start calling them the HABEs.  That's short

for Harboring-Aiding-aBetting-Enablers.  That's

exactly what they are:

Harboring-Aiding-aBetting-Enablers.  That applies to

everyone in the immigration industry who is working to

enable illegal aliens to stay in the United States. 

 

I have a question for the HABEs:  if you love these

illegal aliens so much, why don't you go to THEIR

countries, and use your business skills to help them

survive, and even thrive, in their native land?  I

know why.  It might inconvenience the HABEs.  They'd

rather turn America upside-down than risk a bout of

diarrhea in a third world country.